Radiometric dating of moon rocks

Not only that, they have to show the flaws in those dating studies that provide independent corroborative evidence that radiometric methods work.

If the earth were only 6000–10 000 years old, then surely there should be some scientific evidence to confirm that hypothesis; yet the creationists have produced not a shred of it so far.

The heat of the impact melted some of the feldspar crystals in the granitic rocks of the impact zone, thereby resetting their internal radiometric clocks.

These melted crystals, and therefore the impact, have been dated by the 40Ar/39Ar method at 74.1 Ma (million years; Izett and others 1998), but that is not the whole story by a long shot.

Even things that work well do not work well all of the time and under all circumstances.

Try, for example, wearing a watch that is not waterproof while swimming. A few verified examples of incorrect radiometric ages are simply insufficient to prove that radiometric dating is invalid.

Search for radiometric dating of moon rocks:

radiometric dating of moon rocks-10radiometric dating of moon rocks-4radiometric dating of moon rocks-63radiometric dating of moon rocks-76

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “radiometric dating of moon rocks”

  1. The location, while far from the touristy areas has a lot of charm with a delicious Italian place and super market nearby as well as a beach with varying tide just 2 minute walk away and a gorgeous swimming beach 5/10 minute drive away.

  2. Use on your tablet or smartphone with full access to all the same features you have also on your laptop or computer. Our BDSM chat rooms are a virtual space where kinksters meet and chat about the fetish and BDSM lifestyle - or just whatever!