Isotopic age dating

Other creationists have focused on instances in which radiometric dating seems to yield incorrect results.In most instances, these efforts are flawed because the authors have misunderstood or misrepresented the data they attempt to analyze (for example, Woodmorappe 1979; Morris HM 1985; Morris JD 1994).The results of the Manson Impact/Pierre Shale dating study (Izett and others 1998) are shown in Figure 1.There are three important things to note about these results.Not only that, they have to show the flaws in those dating studies that provide independent corroborative evidence that radiometric methods work.

The fossils, when combined with geologic mapping, allow the various exposed sections of the Pierre Shale to be pieced together in their proper relative positions to form a complete composite section (Figure 1).

Even things that work well do not work well all of the time and under all circumstances.

Try, for example, wearing a watch that is not waterproof while swimming. A few verified examples of incorrect radiometric ages are simply insufficient to prove that radiometric dating is invalid.

I could have selected many more examples but then this would have turned into a book rather than the intended short paper.

The Manson Meteorite Impact and the Pierre Shale In the Cretaceous Period, a large meteorite struck the earth at a location near the present town of Manson, Iowa.

Search for isotopic age dating:

isotopic age dating-37isotopic age dating-22

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “isotopic age dating”